Potpourri News

RMAFC Chairman Advocates for Amendments to Pension Laws: Ex-Governors’ Dual Income Raises Concerns

RMAFC Chairman Advocates for Amendments to Pension Laws: Ex-Governors’ Dual Income Raises Concerns


In the realm of governance and fiscal responsibility, the intricate web of policies, laws, and practices can often become a matter of debate and concern. One such issue that has been at the forefront of discussions in recent times pertains to the payment of pensions to former governors who subsequently take up roles as senators or ministers. This conundrum, as pointed out by the Chairman of the Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission (RMAFC), Mohammed Shehu, has raised pertinent questions about the economic well-being of states and the ethical dimensions of public service.

The Call for Legislative Reform


Mohammed Shehu, in an exclusive interview with Sunday Vanguard in Abuja, emphasized the need for state assemblies to revisit and amend their pension laws. His stance is clear: suspend the payment of pensions to former governors who transition into roles as senators or ministers. This call for legislative reform stems from a deep-seated concern about the financial implications and moral dilemma posed by the current system.

Balancing Economic Interests


Chairman Shehu’s viewpoint underscores the economic rationale behind his proposal. He believes that suspending pension payments to ex-governors who concurrently occupy positions as senators or ministers can significantly contribute to the economic well-being of states, albeit marginally. In an era where states are constantly seeking avenues to bolster their financial resources, every step towards fiscal prudence becomes imperative.

The Complex Dual Income Dilemma


At the heart of this issue lies a complex dual income scenario. It is not uncommon for former governors, who have served their states for either four or eight years, to seamlessly transition into roles as senators or ministers. While this career progression is well within their rights, the crux of the matter is the financial implications it carries. These former governors continue to benefit from generous pension laws that grant them substantial retirement benefits, while simultaneously receiving salaries and allowances for their new roles in public service.

A Confluence of Legal Entitlements


Many states have established laws that confer generous pensions upon former governors, which is entirely within the bounds of legality. However, the ethical dilemma arises when these same individuals take up positions in the federal government as senators or ministers. The result is a confluence of legal entitlements that enable them to draw income from two distinct sources—pensions from their gubernatorial tenures and salaries from their current roles.

Chairman Shehu aptly points out that this situation raises a critical question: should individuals who have had the privilege of serving as governors, with all the associated perks and retirement benefits, continue to draw pensions when they assume new roles in public service? The concern here is not merely a matter of legality but, more importantly, one of ethical responsibility.

Examining the Broader Implications


To truly understand the ramifications of this dual income phenomenon, it is essential to delve into its broader implications. The scenario in question is not an isolated incident but rather a systemic issue that warrants careful consideration.

1. Fiscal Responsibility


In an era where fiscal responsibility is a cornerstone of good governance, the allocation of pensions to individuals who concurrently hold prominent positions in the federal government can raise eyebrows. It potentially diverts substantial funds away from public projects and services that could benefit the broader population.

2. Public Perception

Public perception plays a pivotal role in shaping trust in government institutions. When citizens perceive that former governors are exploiting legal loopholes to amass considerable wealth at the expense of taxpayers, it can erode trust and confidence in the system.

3. Ethical Considerations

Ethical considerations are at the crux of this matter. While legality may allow for the simultaneous receipt of pensions and salaries, the ethical dimension challenges the notion of double-dipping into public coffers. It prompts us to question whether such practices align with the principles of fairness and equity.

The Path Forward

Chairman Shehu’s call for amendments to pension laws offers a path forward that addresses these concerns. By suspending pension payments to former governors once they assume roles as senators or ministers, states can strike a balance between honoring past service and ensuring fiscal responsibility.

A Legislative Imperative

The proposed amendments represent a legislative imperative, one that seeks to align the financial interests of individuals in public service with the broader welfare of the state. It is not a call for the denial of rightful entitlements but rather a step towards creating a more equitable and financially responsible system.

Ensuring Fairness and Accountability

In embracing these changes, states can send a clear message of fairness and accountability to their citizens. It demonstrates a commitment to stewarding public resources judiciously and ethically.

In Conclusion


The issue of former governors receiving pensions while simultaneously earning salaries as senators or ministers is a topic of considerable significance. It touches upon fiscal prudence, public perception, and ethical considerations. Chairman Mohammed Shehu’s call for amendments to pension laws is a thoughtful proposal that merits serious consideration by state assemblies.

By suspending pension payments to ex-governors in such cases, states can take a significant step towards fostering a more equitable and financially responsible system. It is a step that not only respects the rights of former governors but also upholds the principles of fiscal responsibility and ethical governance.

In the ever-evolving landscape of public service and governance, it is imperative to adapt policies and laws to reflect the changing times. Chairman Shehu’s recommendation serves as a beacon, guiding states towards a future where fairness, accountability, and economic prudence coexist harmoniously.


Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *